The cover of the text appeared to have droplets of water on
it, so, using a napkin, I made an effort to wipe them away. I was shown to be a
fool, for these were not water droplets at all, but merely an effect of the
cover painting. I flipped through the internal notations, finding the artwork
credited to one David Caldwell. A painting this convincingly three dimensional
requires a considerable amount of skill. One of two conclusions would explain
this:
A) David
Caldwell is a genius.
B) David
Caldwell is a sorcerer.
This is not an exclusionary disjunction, I decided. He might
be both a genius and a sorcerer. But I was forced to consider that, although I
did not know much of sorcery, it could be presumed that a work of three
dimensional art is not an incredibly difficult thing to create by sorcery, so I
deduced that if he were a genius, he was likely not also a sorcerer.
But upon formalizing this note I reconsider. As a
hypothetical sorcerer operating in a society that does not readily acknowledge
the existence of said black art, perhaps it would be ill-considered to commit
acts which could only be accounted for by sorcery, thus giving up the game and
revealing the true nature of his powers. It would then seem that an intelligent
sorcerer may use his arcane abilities to produce three dimensional works of art
that might otherwise be assumed to be created by non-sorcerer geniuses. If this
is correct and he is a sorcerer, then he is likely a genius.
A conclusion would require further research.
His small terrier dog was harder to apprehend than I had
presumed. Presumption has shown itself, once again, to be my undoing. In the
process I was bitten numerous times. It becomes far more difficult to retain
one’s composure when one is bleeding into the flowerbed of a well-known artist,
possibly also genius and/or sorcerer. The prospect of climbing back over the
fence was more and more daunting after each dog bite on either my hands or
ankles. Surprisingly, the dog was able to lull me into a false sense of
security in several instances, at which point I would bend over and try to
snatch up the small creature. This is when he would occasion to bite my face.
The dog could be the familiar of a sorcerer. Conversely, it
could be a rambunctious terrier dog attacking an invader of its home territory.
It was, without a doubt, the most cunning animal I have ever encountered during
my research. But could this be accounted for by mere innate animal
intelligence? A conclusion would require further research.
Upon eating the dog’s heart, I was unable to come to a
confident conclusion in the matter. It had taken considerable time to light Caldwell’s grill, and shortly
after I had worked out the organs of the tiny beast, someone had alerted the police
to my presence. In my head I am marking the case as open until I can complete the necessary investigation. As I fled
the scene, I wondered if Caldwell
also had a cat or a parrot or, possibly, a large lizard like an iguana. Hamsters
and the like have such small innards that I have never found them useful in my
scientific inquiries.
Copyright 2013 G. Arthur Brown
Copyright 2013 G. Arthur Brown
No comments:
Post a Comment